Brokebutt Mounting

So I finally got around to watching Brokebutt Mounting, er, no… Pokebutt Mountain… wait, that’s still not right… was it Bareback Mountain? Um, no. Let me think… Brokeback Mountain, maybe? Yeah, that’s it, it was Brokeback Mountain. I watched Brokeback Mountain, the cinematic sensation of 2006, a touching, tragic drama about faggot cowboys in love and the horrors of heterosexual marriage.

Jack and Ennis

I was expecting a strong dose of homosexual propaganda, and in that respect, Pokebutt didn’t disappoint. What I wasn’t prepared for, however, was how monumentally boring this movie was. It was about two hours long but felt like four. At 45 minutes, I was already drumming my fingers, wondering when it was going to end so I could go do something more exciting, like trim my toenails or roll those pennies I’ve been accumulating in a jar for the last decade. Even the soporific The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford wasn’t as mindnumbingly dull as this.

Ignoring the propaganda aspect and judging the movie solely on artistic merit, Brokebutt Mounting did not deserve the hype that surrounded it. Sure, the photography was nice, but the acting was stagy and there wasn’t enough of a story to fill two hours. And as beautiful as the natural scenery was, it didn’t make up for the distasteful subject matter. If this movie hadn’t been serving a role in Hollywood’s long-running campaign to normalize and promote homosexuality, it would’ve toured the arthouse circuit, picked up a few awards from queer film festivals, developed a minor cult following within the lavender set, and then it would’ve vanished into obscurity, never attaining the status of household word that it did.

It was notable how little homoeroticism there was on the screen; we get to see the tits of two of the actresses, but all of that sizzling man-on-man action must have ended up on the cutting room floor. That’s because the whole thing would’ve fallen apart and turned into a ludicrous farce that no one could take seriously if they had shown what it was that those “gay” cowboys were actually doing up in those mountains. The audience would’ve been left scratching its head, wondering what was so great about having one’s rectum torn that a man would ruin his entire life for it. It would have come off as sleazy, pathetic, and pathological (which, of course, it is).

A salient feature of the “gay rights” movement is that it never discusses what it is that fags actually do in the bedroom; in other words, it never mentions the defining feature of homosexuality. This is conspicuously omitted from its PR materials because it knows that normal people would be disgusted by these activities and wouldn’t be able to take its political demands seriously. The “civil rights” movement might’ve had some semblance of legitimacy since blacks are, after all, born that way and can’t help the color of their skin; but no one in his right mind is going to assent to granting special rights and privileges to a bunch of hedonistic fudgepackers, grown men with shitty tongues who desire to spend their lives ejaculating down each other’s gullets. I mean, what next — zoophiles demanding the “right” to marry sheep?

One of the cornhole cowboys was named Ennis. Ennis rhymes with penis, and the way his Texan bumbuddy pronounced it, it sounded like he was calling him “anus.” Ennis, penis, anus — was this some sort of inside joke or subliminal message, or just a happy, but random, coincidence?

In the end, Pennis’s bitch Jack, who was a little less bashful about his perversion, gets his head bashed in with a tire iron by a posse of vicious, knuckle-dragging rednecks (are there any other kind?). Despite the fact that Jack was obviously murdered, there is no criminal investigation, the death being filed as accidental, because, you see, for decades The Patriarchy has been covertly perpetrating what amounts to a slow Holocaust against queers by turning a blind eye to fag-bashing. All breeders are in on this conspiracy, including the Sheriff’s office. You could fill a football field with the piled corpses of the victims of homophobia. Jack’s demise was tragic, truly tragic — I lost count of how many tissues I used to sop up my tears — though to let reality intrude for a moment, one might consider that statistically, the odds would’ve been far greater of Jack dying from AIDS than at the hands of heartless hillbillies.

Declaration of War on the Racist, Sexist, Speciest, Homophobic, Xenophobic Patriarchal White World Order

You, heterosexual white gentile males,

Hateful racist right-wing fuckers —

You are what’s preventing world peace.

You are impeding the New Age of Enlightenment.

If it weren’t for you, we’d all be living in an earthly paradise right now, holding hands, singing Kumbaya, with universal health care and beautiful mixed-race children turned into budding Einsteins through the magic of public schooling. There’d even be free tofu burgers for everyone.

You are the problem. You must be done away with.

In order for Humanity to thrive, you, White Man, must die.

Give me convenience or give me death

No cash in Sweden

Leave it to Sweden, the country that makes boys wear skirts to school, to be the first to outlaw cash.

Swedes can kiss autonomy from the grid and the privacy afforded by anonymous cash transactions goodbye.

Jews don’t play dice with the Nobel Prize

Einstein sticking his tongue out

According to Time magazine, Albert Einstein was so certain he was going to win the Nobel Prize that in 1919, he had his notary create a document giving the prize money to his ex-wife, two years before he actually won it, in 1921.

Was Einstein arrogant as hell, clairvoyant, or did he have inside information that the contest was being rigged in his favor?

The Time article suggests this gift may have been a pay-off to his first wife for being the uncredited author of much of his work. If so, that wouldn’t be the first time Einstein took credit for others’ ideas.

Incidentally, it would seem that, last year, a Swiss lab observed subatomic particles called neutrinos moving faster than the speed of light, a finding which, if true, would cast Einstein’s special theory of relativity into doubt. It remains to be seen, however, whether this observation was accurate or merely a glitch resulting from a faulty fiber-optic cable.

Response to John Gray

Holodomor victim

A victim of the Holodomor, a holocaust in which 10 million Ukrainian and Russian peasants were deliberately starved to death by Stalin and his henchmen

Two weeks ago, someone named John Gray left the following comment in my guestbook:

Author: JohnGray
Posted February 23, 2012 at 10:34 pm

The real horror of the Holocaust is that it was a deliberate policy of a government to kill all members of an particular ethnic group.Stalin didn’t care if the people of the Ukraine were Jewish,ethnic Russian or some other ethnicity-if they went along with his policies he had no problem with them.The Nazis started a deliberate program to kill all Jews in Germany and occupied Europe,no matter if these Jews might have actually contributed to the Nazi war machine’s victories.
Also on page showing racist cartoons from WWII by Dr.Seuss you defended the interment of Japanese-Americans in WWII.Perhaps you can tell me if the government interned all Americans of German or Italian descent during WWII?The real motive behind the internment of Japanese-Americans in WWII was racism,even a Supreme Court stacked with right wing ideologues has acknowledged there was no compelling governmental interest in the internment and forced relocation of Japanese-Americans during WWII.
Excuse me,but your white sheet is showing.

Here are the responses I posted:

Author: Igor Alexander
Posted March 6, 2012 at 2:06 pm

First of all, why did you choose to post this in the guestbook? If you’re writing this in response to a post you read on this blog, that would be the appropriate place to start this debate. It’s as if you don’t want anyone to read this.

You’ve made so many incorrect statements that I don’t know where to start.

But how about here: While Stalin himself may not have been jewish, and there is evidence suggesting that he may have been anti-Semitic, almost all of the men who were responsible for actually carrying out the Ukrainian holocaust were jews; and yes, they were driven by a genocidal hatred of white Christian gentiles. Read Stalin’s Willing Executioners.

Why haven’t you heard of this? Maybe you can ask Steven Spielberg why he hasn’t directed a big-budget tearjerker about it, or ask Raul Hilberg why he hasn’t written a 1300-page dissertation on the subject. Why haven’t these genocidal jews been brought to justice for their crimes, Nuremberg-style? Simple — it’s because they weren’t on the losing side of a major war. Victors never get put on trial for “war crimes” or “human rights” violations. Victors write the history books.

Secondly, there is not a shred of evidence that the German government was carrying out a “deliberate program” of exterminating Europe’s jews. Even mainstream “holocaust scholars” have stepped away from making that claim in recent decades, since it is so poorly supported. If you disagree, then by all means, present the evidence.

Thirdly, there are many recorded cases of men of jewish extraction serving in the German military during WWII. A jewish historian, Bryan Mark Rigg, wrote a book about it called Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers.

Fourthly, yes, as a matter of fact, there were men of German and Italian descent placed in concentration camps in the US, Canada, and probably other Allied nations during the Second World War, for no reason other than their national or ethnic origins. Sometimes they were even placed in the same camps as the Japanese. You didn’t know that? There’s a lot that you don’t seem to know. Maybe you can ask your old teachers why you weren’t taught these things in history class.

And what’s your opinion of the camps white people were herded into by the Japanese during the Second World War? Did the Japs hold racist motives? J. G. Ballard’s autobiographical novel Empire of the Sun describes the three years he spent as a boy in a Japanese concentration camp.

Stop parroting holocaust lies and propaganda and do your own thinking and research. And for God’s sake, stop feeling guilty for being white! Your race has done far more to benefit the colored world than it has to harm it.

Response #2:

Author: Igor Alexander
Posted March 6, 2012 at 2:43 pm

“…even a Supreme Court stacked with right wing ideologues has acknowledged…”

Um, what makes you think “right wing ideologues,” by which I suppose you mean conservatives, are any less subservient to political correctness than left-wing ideologues like yourself? They’re not. Conservatives are as happy to join hands on Martin Luther King Day and sing Kumbaya as you are.

Excuse me, but your copy of The Daily Worker is jutting out of your back pocket. Now I understand why you’re so eager to play down Soviet atrocities like the Holodomor.

Response #3:

Author: Igor Alexander
Posted March 12, 2012 at 6:48 am

“…no matter if these Jews might have actually contributed to the Nazi war machine’s victories…”

Ah yes, the innocent jews, those poor, persecuted martyrs; such loyal Germans, shipped off to “death camps” to do hard labor or be gassed for no other reason than that they ate matzah balls instead of ham. Never mind that the German government was fighting a grueling war on two fronts and that resources and personnel were scarce; it just had to find a way to implement an over-complicated, uber-secret program to exterminate 6 million of these model citizens no matter what it took from the war effort.

The only problem with this naive, simplistic view is that many of the jews who populated these work camps were communists who were actively involved in treasonous and seditious activities against Germany, trying to aid Germany’s enemies in a time of war, and fully deserved to be there. No nation on earth, not even the most liberal, is going to allow collaborators and saboteurs to run free in the streets while it’s fighting a war for its survival.

Albert Einstein is a good example of the type of jew who would’ve found himself in a concentration camp had he remained in Germany. His FBI files reveal that he was “a member, sponsor, or affiliated with fifty communist fronts between 1937-1954” and “served as honorary chairman for three communist organizations.” Einstein didn’t “flee” Germany simply because he was a jew; he fled because he was under surveillance there for housing Soviet agents. Like so many of his fellow tribesmen, Einstein was a shit-disturbing radical; he wanted to overthrow the German government and install in its place a jewish-administered totalitarian regime like the one briefly headed by half-jew Béla Kun in Hungary. More about Einstein’s communist loyalties and profound hatred of Germany.

To paraphrase Joe McCarthy’s homosexual jewish aid Roy Cohn: maybe not all jews were communists, but most communists were jews. It would’ve been difficult in the first half of the 20th century to be an anti-communist without appearing anti-jewish. If jews and communism weren’t one and the same, then they were difficult to disentangle. It would be no exaggeration to state that at least two-thirds of the known Soviet spies in the United States were jews.

Discussing how jews were treated in Nazi Germany without mentioning the special role they played in communism isn’t honest, especially in light of the fact that WWII was essentially a conflict between fascism and communism.

If Mr. Gray would like to continue this debate, he should do so here in the comments section of this post rather than in the guestbook. Others are of course welcome to chime in.

Anarchist hypocrisy

“The sin of nearly all left wingers from 1933 onwards is that they have wanted to be anti-Fascist without being anti-totalitarian.” –George Orwell

Graffiti - Spread Anarchy

Anyone who claims to oppose state oppression and champion individual freedom while refusing to roundly condemn the persecution, prosecution, and imprisonment of so-called “holocaust deniers” in Western Europe is a hypocrite, plain and simple. That includes most of the leftists who call themselves “anarchists,” not to mention the major “human rights” organizations.

With friends like these, who needs enemies?

I was listening to the Alex Jones Show yesterday (Friday, March 4) on shortwave and someone called in and started talking about “international jewish bankers” being behind the New World Order. Jones gave the caller a lot of time to speak without interrupting him or cutting him off.

At first, the caller sounded sensible. He mentioned that the American mass media is dominated by jews, which is true. He brought up Paul Warburg‘s name in connection with the Federal Reserve. And considering Jones had had some not-so-nice things to say about George Soros, another jew, only minutes before this call, it would have been disingenuous of him to claim jews aren’t overrepresented in the ranks of international financiers. So far, so good.

Then the caller urged listeners to read the long-discredited Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Jones asked the caller if he believed that all jews are involved in the conspiracy, to which the caller replied in the affirmative. Jones then asked if all jews should be exterminated, and the caller said yes. I slapped my hand to my forehead and started shaking my head. Predictably, Jones cut the caller off at that point and went on a tirade against nazis.

Why do so many anti-Semites* insist on shooting themselves in the foot like this guy did?

While Jones has a long and shameful history of covering for the jews, you can’t accuse him of any wrongdoing in this case; he gave the guy plenty of time to make his case without censoring him. You can’t ask for more than a fair hearing. If the caller came off looking foolish, he did it to himself.

I’m starting to believe that a large number of anti-Semites really are mentally ill. Either that, or they’re stupid. It’s like their brains are incapable of distinguishing between the jew who mops the floors at the local Burger King and the George Soroses and Sumner Redstones of the world, who truly are malignant pests.

There are several valid criticisms that can be leveled against jews as a group. For instance, an elite group of jews really does have a disproportionately large amount of control over the mass media in countries like the U.S. and Canada, and it uses this control towards ends that are usually not in the best interest of the majority population.

The Israel lobby is real and very powerful.

The holocaust is a Big Lie that was invented by jews, communists, and the leaders of the Allied nations to justify or help conceal their own atrocities, and the myth was rekindled in the latter half of the 1960s by zionist jews to drum up support for and deflect criticism of Israel. In the last 12 years, the myth of the holocaust has been invoked to justify everything from the NATO bombing of civilian passenger trains in Yugoslavia, to the hanging of Saddam Hussein as a “war criminal,” to the U.S.’s belligerent attitude toward Iran.

But reasoned criticisms such as these tend to be overlooked when you have paranoid nutcases shouting from rooftops that they think every jew on the planet is involved in a monolithic conspiracy that’s behind all the evils in the world and that every last one needs to be exterminated, pronto.

If I didn’t know such people personally, I would think they were plants from the Defamation League of B’nai B’rith and the $PLC to make anti-Semites look retarded or unhinged.

The debate on the Jewish Question is polarized between apologists for the jews like Alex Jones and Jar-Jar Taylor, who would sooner blame their own mothers for the ills they diagnose than utter the word “jew,” and conspiracy wackos who have gone off the deep end and become obsessed with jews to the exclusion of everything else.

Footnote:


* I’m not entirely comfortable with the term anti-Semite to describe someone who’s critical of or antipathetic towards jews, for two reasons:


  1. In a time in which blond, ashkenazi jews who don’t have a drop of Semitic blood in them are gunning down rock-throwing Palestinian children, some of whom are full-blooded Semites, referring to anti-jewish sentiment as “anti-Semitism” doesn’t make a lot of sense, and

  2. “Anti-Semitism” has a biological ring to it, which implies that the solution to the problem is extermination, and not everyone who opposes the agendas of organized jewry feels that way.

“Anti-jewish” would be an improvement, but is still not quite satisfactory. The best term, I think, would be anti-loxist, but since loxism has yet to catch on, no one would know what I was talking about were I to use it.

Why I no longer support white nationalism

Through a campaign which has been in full swing for about 50 years and which has noticeably accelerated over the last 20, the jewish mass media has successfully managed to persuade the bulk of the younger generations of white people that:

  • it’s OK to have sex with anyone they please, whether the person be white, black, brown, red, yellow, male, or female.
  • their ancestors were assholes who should be repudiated and whose values should be scoffed at.

    What this basically means is that the jews have won. When the masses of our young people feel this way, that means it’s “game over” for us. Those who refuse to see that are no better than members of the “Werwolf” units who, after the Second World War, refused to accept the Reich’s defeat and continued to resist Allied occupation.

    Anyone who at this late date thinks he’s going to take his country back through the ballot box or through some Nazi-like paramilitary movement has got his head in the clouds. The only thing that makes sense to talk about at this point is a semi-underground survival movement for the minority of whites who reject the multiracial New World Order and care to remain white.

  • Should we be concerned about overpopulation?

    I’m somewhere in-between the hardcore Malthusian misanthropists, who’d like to see 90+ per cent of the world’s population be exterminated, and the humanists who dismiss concerns over overpopulation as alarmist. I feel strongly that everyone should be living on a diet that is organically or biodynamically grown, raised, or produced on small family farms, or is hunted or fished in the wild. The problem is, the world’s population can’t be fed in this manner at the size it is right now.

    We currently have a system that seeks to maximize yields at the expense of quality, and that system is going to continue to exist as long as there are so many hungry mouths to feed.

    When Alex Jones and his ilk claim the New World Order elites have an agenda to exterminate the bulk of the world’s population, they are precisely inverting the truth; all one has to do is look at population statistics for a continent like Africa to see that the numbers there over the last hundred years have been steadily rising, not dropping. The New World Order wants more hungry mouths to feed, not less, since more mouths represent greater profits.

    The only slice of the world’s population which is slated for extermination is the white race, as is made abundantly clear by our declining birth rates, the immigration policies our elites have imposed on us, the campaign to promote race-mixing, casual sex, homosexuality, and feminism, and the introduction of feminizing substances into our food supply, such as soy in baby formula.

    I have a theory…

    …about Alex Linder.

    I think Alex realized a long time ago that this is a lost cause, but instead of shrugging his shoulders and moving on to something else like a grown-up would, he decided to keep that forum of his open as his own little playground, a place where he can troll and blow off steam and shout from the highest soap box.