Ship of Fools

by Ted Kaczynski
SinkingShip

Once upon a time, the captain and the mates of a ship grew so vain of their seamanship, so full of hubris and so impressed with themselves, that they went mad. They turned the ship north and sailed until they met with icebergs and dangerous floes, and they kept sailing north into more and more perilous waters, solely in order to give themselves opportunities to perform ever-more-brilliant feats of seamanship.

As the ship reached higher and higher latitudes, the passengers and crew became increasingly uncomfortable. They began quarreling among themselves and complaining of the conditions under which they lived.

“Shiver me timbers,” said an able seaman, “if this ain’t the worst voyage I’ve ever been on. The deck is slick with ice; when I’m on lookout the wind cuts through me jacket like a knife; every time I reef the foresail I blamed-near freeze me fingers; and all I get for it is a miserable five shillings a month!”

“You think you have it bad!” said a lady passenger. “I can’t sleep at night for the cold. Ladies on this ship don’t get as many blankets as the men. It isn’t fair!”

A Mexican sailor chimed in: “¡Chingado! I’m only getting half the wages of the Anglo seamen. We need plenty of food to keep us warm in this climate, and I’m not getting my share; the Anglos get more. And the worst of it is that the mates always give me orders in English instead of Spanish.”

“I have more reason to complain than anybody,” said an American Indian sailor. “If the palefaces hadn’t robbed me of my ancestral lands, I wouldn’t even be on this ship, here among the icebergs and arctic winds. I would just be paddling a canoe on a nice, placid lake. I deserve compensation. At the very least, the captain should let me run a crap game so that I can make some money.”

The bosun spoke up: “Yesterday the first mate called me a ‘fruit’ just because I suck cocks. I have a right to suck cocks without being called names for it!”

“It’s not only humans who are mistreated on this ship,” interjected an animal-lover among the passengers, her voice quivering with indignation. “Why, last week I saw the second mate kick the ship’s dog twice!”

One of the passengers was a college professor. Wringing his hands he exclaimed, “All this is just awful! It’s immoral! It’s racism, sexism, speciesism, homophobia, and exploitation of the working class! It’s discrimination! We must have social justice: Equal wages for the Mexican sailor, higher wages for all sailors, compensation for the Indian, equal blankets for the ladies, a guaranteed right to suck cocks, and no more kicking the dog!”

“Yes, yes!” shouted the passengers. “Aye-aye!” shouted the crew. “It’s discrimination! We have to demand our rights!”

The cabin boy cleared his throat.

“Ahem. You all have good reasons to complain. But it seems to me that what we really have to do is get this ship turned around and headed back south, because if we keep going north we’re sure to be wrecked sooner or later, and then your wages, your blankets, and your right to suck cocks won’t do you any good, because we’ll all drown.”

But no one paid any attention to him, because he was only the cabin boy.

The captain and the mates, from their station on the poop deck, had been watching and listening.

Now they smiled and winked at one another, and at a gesture from the captain the third mate came down from the poop deck, sauntered over to where the passengers and crew were gathered, and shouldered his way in amongst them. He put a very serious expression on his face and spoke thusly:

“We officers have to admit that some really inexcusable things have been happening on this ship. We hadn’t realized how bad the situation was until we heard your complaints. We are men of good will and want to do right by you. But – well – the captain is rather conservative and set in his ways, and may have to be prodded a bit before he’ll make any substantial changes. My personal opinion is that if you protest vigorously – but always peacefully and without violating any of the ship’s rules – you would shake the captain out of his inertia and force him to address the problems of which you so justly complain.”

Having said this, the third mate headed back toward the poop deck. As he went, the passengers and crew called after him, “Moderate! Reformer! Goody-liberal! Captain’s stooge!” But they nevertheless did as he said. They gathered in a body before the poop deck, shouted insults at the officers, and demanded their rights: “I want higher wages and better working conditions,” cried the able seaman.

“Equal blankets for women,” cried the lady passenger. “I want to receive my orders in Spanish,” cried the Mexican sailor. “I want the right to run a crap game,” cried the Indian sailor. “I don’t want to be called a fruit,” cried the bosun. “No more kicking the dog,” cried the animal lover. “Revolution now,” cried the professor.

The captain and the mates huddled together and conferred for several minutes, winking, nodding and smiling at one another all the while. Then the captain stepped to the front of the poop deck and, with a great show of benevolence, announced that the able seaman’s wages would be raised to six shillings a month; the Mexican sailor’s wages would be raised to two-thirds the wages of an Anglo seaman, and the order to reef the foresail would be given in Spanish; lady passengers would receive one more blanket; the Indian sailor would be allowed to run a crap game on Saturday nights; the bosun wouldn’t be called a fruit as long as he kept his cocksucking strictly private; and the dog wouldn’t be kicked unless he did something really naughty, such as stealing food from the galley.

The passengers and crew celebrated these concessions as a great victory, but the next morning, they were again feeling dissatisfied.

“Six shillings a month is a pittance, and I still freeze me fingers when I reef the foresail,” grumbled the able seaman. “I’m still not getting the same wages as the Anglos, or enough food for this climate,” said the Mexican sailor. “We women still don’t have enough blankets to keep us warm,” said the lady passenger. The other crewmen and passengers voiced similar complaints, and the professor egged them on.

When they were done, the cabin boy spoke up – louder this time so that the others could not easily ignore him: “It’s really terrible that the dog gets kicked for stealing a bit of bread from the galley, and that women don’t have equal blankets, and that the able seaman gets his fingers frozen; and I don’t see why the bosun shouldn’t suck cocks if he wants to. But look how thick the icebergs are now, and how the wind blows harder and harder! We’ve got to turn this ship back toward the south, because if we keep going north we’ll be wrecked and drowned.”

“Oh yes,” said the bosun, “It’s just so awful that we keep heading north. But why should I have to keep cocksucking in the closet? Why should I be called a fruit? Ain’t I as good as everyone else?”

“Sailing north is terrible,” said the lady passenger. “But don’t you see? That’s exactly why women need more blankets to keep them warm. I demand equal blankets for women now!”

“It’s quite true,” said the professor, “that sailing to the north imposes great hardships on all of us. But changing course toward the south would be unrealistic. You can’t turn back the clock. We must find a mature way of dealing with the situation.”

“Look,” said the cabin boy, “If we let those four madmen up on the poop deck have their way, we’ll all be drowned. If we ever get the ship out of danger, then we can worry about working conditions, blankets for women, and the right to suck cocks. But first we’ve got to get this vessel turned around. If a few of us get together, make a plan, and show some courage, we can save ourselves. It wouldn’t take many of us – six or eight would do. We could charge the poop, chuck those lunatics overboard, and turn the ship to the south.”

The professor elevated his nose and said sternly, “I don’t believe in violence. It’s immoral.”

“It’s unethical ever to use violence,” said the bosun.

“I’m terrified of violence,” said the lady passenger.

The captain and the mates had been watching and listening all the while. At a signal from the captain, the third mate stepped down to the main deck. He went about among the passengers and crew, telling them that there were still many problems on the ship.

“We have made much progress,” he said, “But much remains to be done. Working conditions for the able seaman are still hard, the Mexican still isn’t getting the same wages as the Anglos, the women still don’t have quite as many blankets as the men, the Indian’s Saturday-night crap game is a paltry compensation for his lost lands, it’s unfair to the bosun that he has to keep his cocksucking in the closet, and the dog still gets kicked at times.

“I think the captain needs to be prodded again. It would help if you all would put on another protest – as long as it remains nonviolent.”

As the third mate walked back toward the stern, the passengers and the crew shouted insults after him, but they nevertheless did what he said and gathered in front of the poop deck for another protest. They ranted and raved and brandished their fists, and they even threw a rotten egg at the captain (which he skillfully dodged).

After hearing their complaints, the captain and the mates huddled for a conference, during which they winked and grinned broadly at one another. Then the captain stepped to the front of the poop deck and announced that the able seaman would be given gloves to keep his fingers warm, the Mexican sailor would receive wages equal to three-fourths the wages of an Anglo seaman, the women would receive yet another blanket, the Indian sailor could run a crap game on Saturday and Sunday nights, the bosun would be allowed to suck cocks publicly after dark, and no one could kick the dog without special permission from the captain.

The passengers and crew were ecstatic over this great revolutionary victory, but by the next morning they were again feeling dissatisfied and began grumbling about the same old hardships.

The cabin boy this time was getting angry.

“You damn fools!” he shouted. “Don’t you see what the captain and the mates are doing? They’re keeping you occupied with your trivial grievances about blankets and wages and the dog being kicked so that you won’t think about what is really wrong with this ship — that it’s getting farther and farther to the north and we’re all going to be drowned. If just a few of you would come to your senses, get together, and charge the poop deck, we could turn this ship around and save ourselves.

But all you do is whine about petty little issues like working conditions and crap games and the right to suck cocks.”

The passengers and the crew were incensed.

“Petty!” cried the Mexican. “Do you think it’s reasonable that I get only three-fourths the wages of an Anglo sailor? Is that petty?”

“How can you call my grievance trivial?” shouted the bosun. “Don’t you know how humiliating it is to be called a fruit?”

“Kicking the dog is not a ‘petty little issue!’” screamed the animal-lover. “It’s heartless, cruel, and brutal!”

“Alright then,” answered the cabin boy. “These issues are not petty and trivial. Kicking the dog is cruel and brutal and it is humiliating to be called a fruit. But in comparison to our real problem – in comparison to the fact that the ship is still heading north – your grievances are petty and trivial, because if we don’t get this ship turned around soon, we’re all going to drown.”

“Fascist!” said the professor.

“Counterrevolutionary!” said the lady passenger. And all of the passengers and crew chimed in one after another, calling the cabin boy a fascist and a counterrevolutionary.

They pushed him away and went back to grumbling about wages, and about blankets for women, and about the right to suck cocks, and about how the dog was treated. The ship kept sailing north, and after a while it was crushed between two icebergs and everyone drowned.

21 responses

  1. 14_NSBM_Warrior_88 | Reply

    I love this story! Have you read “Industrial Society and It’s Future”? That’s an equally good read.

    Kaczynski remains the only Anarchist I can safely say I respect. For the most part, all the others are contemptible Marxist communitarian/collectivists, especially those Anarcho-Punks.

  2. Igor Alexander | Reply

    “Have you read ‘Industrial Society and It’s Future’?”

    Yeah, I read it a few years ago. Kaczynski is definitely not any kind of a pink tofu eater or namby-pamby Green Party supporter. He opposes women’s rights, animal rights, egalitarianism in general, and there are even a few passages in his manifesto which hint that he understands that the reason Western civilization became “dynamic” while others stagnated was racial.

    I agree with much of what he wrote in that tract (and I definitely don’t think he’s insane), but I’ve come to disagree with his ultimate conclusion (that industrial society must be destroyed). At this point, I don’t think it’s possible to destroy industrial society, even if it were desirable.

    I mean, suppose the West was to deliberately go back to living in the horse-and-buggy era; well, what would happen is that another society, say the Chinese, who hadn’t downgraded their technology, would end up taking over the planet (and for those who love nature, like Kaczynski, that would make a bad situation worse, because the only race on the planet that seems to really give a crap about conserving wildlife, controlling population growth, and managing natural resources is the white race).

    Going back to this hunter-gatherer Garden of Eden Kaczynski envisions is a pipe dream. It’ll never happen. Like a sled speeding down a snowy hill, we’re locked on this course of technological development and there’s no turning back. There isn’t any way to “unlearn” the science that makes our technological society possible. The genie’s out of the bottle and he’s staying out. You could destroy industrial society 100 times over and it would always rise up again, as long as there were people around who remembered the science that made it possible. The only way to destroy industrial society is to exterminate the human species (especially the white race), and that’s not an option I’m willing to consider.

    Kaczynski makes a lot of good points about the loss of privacy, freedom, and human dignity that accompanies technological “progress,” and I wish that we as a society would address these types of issues more. In my experience, questioning the equation that “technological change = progress” is almost as taboo as questioning the equality of the races or the reality of the holocaust.

    Kaczynski also makes penetrating observations on the psychology of the left, and offers good advice for organizing a revolutionary movement. A highly intelligent man.

    I don’t share Kaczynski’s objectives, but the story above could just as well have been written about the death of the West and what must be done to stop it.

  3. Igor Alexander | Reply

    I agree about the anacho-punks. They’re some of the thickest people around. They couldn’t come up with an original thought if their lives depended on it, yet they accuse others of conformity. People on the far right are continually caricatured as being knuckle-dragging retards, but most of the folks I’ve spoken to in this movement have been exceptionally bright. I guess you’d have to be smart to find your way out of the mental box “they” try to impose on us and figure out what’s really going on.

    I used to be into anarcho-punk bands like Crass and the Dead Kennedys when I was a teenager. I find the lyrical content, now that I’m older and wiser, just pathetic. Teenagers that listen to this stuff don’t have the life’s experience, breadth of knowledge, or the critical faculties to properly evaluate it, so they just accept the mantras without thinking about them. At least the Dead Kennedys had good music (which is more than you can say for Crass, though those fold-out poster record sleeves were cool). The first two DKs records weren’t actually bad lyrically; lots of satire aimed at the cesspool American culture has become. It’s only later that Jello Biafra lost his subtlety and became obnoxiously preachy.

    I watched two documentaries recently, The Decline of Western Civilization parts 1 and 3. The first deals with the LA punk scene in 1980, and the third revisits that scene in 1997. It’s incredible how feminized and politically correct punk became in the 17 years between these films. It went from bands like Fear riling the audience by calling them homos and the singer of Black Flag bragging about his womanizing to bands like Naked Aggression and Final Conflict railing against the “oppression of women and gays” and raising money for women’s shelters and AIDS research. If I was a rebellious teenager today, the last thing I’d be attracted to would be punk. Punk today is about as exciting as a sociology course.

    What do you think of National Anarchism? I was having an argument a few years ago with a guy (a communist) who insisted that anarchism was a “left-wing” movement that was closely related to communism. I found that claim odd, since anarchism almost seems the antithesis of communism’s centralized control over everything.

    I mentioned National Anarchism to him. I also suggested that libertarianism comes closer to anarchism than communism does. He didn’t like that, since he considers libertarianism to be a “right-wing” movement. Personally, I see libertarianism as being neither “left-wing” nor “right-wing,” but as merely another false ideology promulgated by Jews to fracture the group identity of whites by making them think of themselves as raceless atomized “individuals” with no collective interests that could come into conflict with those of Jews.

    1. 14_NSBM_Warrior_88 | Reply

      My interest in Punk Rock faded as soon as I discovered far better genres of music. I’m still convinced Heavy Metal is the best form of Rock n’ Roll ever, but that’s for another day.

      When people hear the word Libertarian, they automatically jump to Republitarian, when in truth, neither Libertarianism nor the Republican Party are necessarily linked.

      My criticism of Anarchism stems from their preoccupation with critique and theory. Anarchists, especially the Collectivist Anarchists (roll call: Anarch”a”-Feminists, Anarcho-Communists, Anarcho-Communitarians, etc.) typically concern themselves more with fighting against an opposing concept/people rather than actually creating their own society. As such, I find, from its lack of constructive elements, Anarchism’s practicality remains compromised; simply telling the world their preconceived notions of reality are false won’t work. Also, I find Anarchism to be a uniquely Western concept (and, if I may add, a very bourgeoisie and upper-class phenomenon), having absolutely NO appeal anywhere else, especially the sociocentric Far East, which ironically stresses Collectivism. The Orientals are quite fond of having a central government, and for the Japanese, a racialist state fits them well.

      National Anarchism (or Anarcho-Nationalism) and Anarcho-Primitivism remain two unique curiosities within the Anarchist subculture. As evidenced by Theodore Kaczynski, both hold highly contrary viewpoints stressed by their Communist-influenced peers. Again, though, they’re simply political philosophies and theories. Trying to enlighten the world on even these particular viewpoints wont’ work; people are far too accustomed to having a government, be it in or against their best interests.

    2. The fact that anarchism and communism are closely allied is part of the insanity of the whole leftist philosophy.

      They just don’t seem to mesh do they? Until you get to the root core and motivation of both of them, which is an underlying hatred and envy of those with greater possessions. A hatred of God. A hatred of perceived “unfairness”. Rebellion against the natural order of things in the West. Rebellion is what the left is all about. All of these movements are based in the worst instincts of mankind. Really, the Western world has generated its own worst enemies, with the very systems that generate so much wealth and prosperity.

      Communism, anarchism, all the other “isms” – they are merely the macrocosmic examples of the spoiled rich kid who bites the hand that feeds him.

      You also have to consider the fact that many anarchists are merely the “useful idiots” who are promoted by the communists to subvert and undermine capitalist societies. To destabilize them and prepare them for revolution. Once the communists take power, they then line the pure anarchists up against a wall and shoot them.

      Go further down the path of insanity and notice that the left and radical Islam also seem to be working together against the West. The atheist and the fundamentalist, working together. How odd. I wonder who is deceiving whom, in this relationship…

      1. 14_NSBM_Warrior_88

        Truth be told, the Communist Atheist only seeks allegiance with a Sharia-Shithead as a means to an end. I highly doubt Atheists have ANY ideological connections with Muslims. In fact, the ones I’ve spoken with have an otherwise mutual hatred for one another.

        As naive as this may sound, though rivalry between the Western world and the Islamic world can be traced a Millennium back, foreign relations will improve with them if we stop feeding the Z.O.G.

      2. Igor Alexander

        “As naive as this may sound, though rivalry between the Western world and the Islamic world can be traced a Millennium back, foreign relations will improve with them if we stop feeding the Z.O.G.”

        That’s not naive at all. Islamic fundamentalism is almost a direct reaction to the ZOG. The only people who have a tough time getting that through their heads are the neo-kahn patriotards.

      3. You’re right about that! Anarchists (or libertarian socialists, true communists ) must never trust the state communists again.

      4. It’s worth reading Alex Linder’s political ideas. I don’t think he’s written a manifesto as such, but they can be found spread throughout the VNN Forum.

        Basically, he wants a strong but very limited central government for defense (which includes keeping the nation white), and after that, it’s up to each community to organize itself however it sees fit. Decentralization, individual freedom and responsibility, no more nanny state… I think this is the way to go.

  4. WHITE SURVIVAL | Reply

    Great comments Igor and others.

    “I mean, suppose the West was to deliberately go back to living in the horse-and-buggy era; well, what would happen is that another society, say the Chinese, who hadn’t downgraded their technology, would end up taking over the planet (and for those who love nature, like Kaczynski, that would make a bad situation worse, because the only race on the planet that seems to really give a crap about conserving wildlife, controlling population growth, and managing natural resources is the white race).

    I recently posted about that exact issue @ http://www.toqonline.com/2009/06/spengler-an-introduction/#comment-391 – dload Man and Technics for free @ http://www.archive.org/details/ManTechnics-AContributionToAPhilosophyOfLife193253

    I also agree with you fully that Whites are the racial group on Earth that is most concerned and active in preserving the Earth’s environment by quite a long shot.

    The best of advanced technology will have to be preserved, while the useless stuff will need to be dismantled/discontinued. Too much population growth (especially non-White population growth in White countries) and too much technological development, plus the accompanying ‘commerce’ of these human factors, is degrading large swathes of the environment, leading to environmental unsustainability: “too much commerce, too much ‘progress,’ too much industrialization, too much consumerism, and too much development are destroying the earth’s environment and as such must be sharply reigned in to more sustainable levels.” – http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/ahmadinejad-wins-fair-and-square-in-iran-imperialistzionist-green-color-revolution-smashed-by-the-iranian-people/#comments

    Are you familiar with the ideas of the Southern Agrarians who wrote the 1930 book I’LL TAKE MY STAND? Read the introductory essay @ http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MA01/White/anthology/agrarian.html – we may need to return to a simpler/slower (but still technologically connected) agrarian focused-type lifestyle with an emphasis on long-term sustainability. Not too much population density in one area or overcrowding, no anonymous urban living – much more contact with nature, especially your local environment. We could consult the Amish in this regard, and learn much from them…but still retain the most useful technolgoy which they shun. We’ll still need many factories however to produce weapons/munitions and such for defense, as well as the basic and easily mass-manufactured consumer goods needed for large populations. But it could be mostly decentralized to avoid concentrating environmental degradation in only one area…spread it out thinly in order to distribute the bad environmental impact of heavy industry more lightly. Return to more local agriculture, local livestock, local hunting/gathering – all planned very well, researched exhaustively, and revised when needed. White racially/culturally homogeneous ‘ecovillages’ or ‘ecocities’ all tightly and intensively connected over the internet and through other modern communication technologies but also mostly self-sufficient in terms of food production and other basic necessities – no more radical division of labor. Population-levels are eventually controlled rather tightly, but stable replacement levels assured after a period of strong growth to bring White population back up to speed…various forms of eugenics could also be optimally utilized. Totally oil free societies, as pollution free and clean as possible, run entirely on alternative energies (NOTE: this is still dependent on future White technological breakthroughs). All of these White ecovillages/ecocities are connected with eco-friendly mass-transit, and very clean ‘greencars’ are free to buy for cheap or rent to travel other medium distances; much local work/travel/recreation is actually done on foot in your local area within a few of the surrounding square miles, but pollution-free transportation would be freely available 24-7 to travel anywhere needed. All known books/articles/etc that have ever written as well as any other human knowledge is to be digitized and then loaded on to the internet, free for anyone to browse or print out and read – the internet remains completely uncensored in terms of use, discussion, and research and is and free for everyone to use for all time; servers are decentralized in order to prevent too much internet monopolization or censorship. Mostly decentralized banking, decentralized media that is still nationally aggregative, the rights of states always trump federal laws, local rights even more important than state ones.

    Industrialism and technological development is good up to a certain point – but after too much it is extremely detrimental to a society and its long-term feasibility because of all the environmental degradation as well as socio-cultural damage wrought by over-industrialism/over-technologization.

    I agree with you that Kaczynski was too extreme in seeking to destroy modern technological society entirely…we’ll keep the best, the cleanest, and the most useful of it (again, let us consult the Amish on how to revive some of the old methods), but quite a bit of it will definitely need to be destroyed/dismantled and returned to nature or put in to better/cleaner socio-industrial uses. See: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/financialcrisis/5516536/US-cities-may-have-to-be-bulldozed-in-order-to-survive.html

    While I’m here I invite you to read the following comment I recently wrote on the topic of WHITE SURVIVAL – http://www.toqonline.com/2009/06/the-myth-of-our-regeneration/#comment-393we need to build openly and explicitly pro-White societies/cultures – despite the decentralization I propose, an implicit understanding and allegiance to the collective Pan-White ideal would be needed amongst all of the disparate White communities in order to begin to work toward the above-described ideal White society.

    1. Igor Alexander | Reply

      “Industrialism and technological development is good up to a certain point – but after too much it is extremely detrimental to a society and its long-term feasibility because of all the environmental degradation as well as socio-cultural damage wrought by over-industrialism/over-technologization.”

      Technology should be our servant, not our master.

  5. WHITE SURVIVAL | Reply

    More suggestions for ‘saving civilization’:

    I. Getting More Socially, Economically, and Politically Organized
    a. The internet (plus other modern forms of communication) offers amazing new possibilities for social organization and community coordination
    b. Re-activating and re-connecting local/regional communities – better city/county/state planning; much more community involvement
    II. Re-Localization, Re-Regionalization, De-Centralization, and Possibly Even Partial De-Industrialization/De-Urbanization
    a. Scaling down life – much simpler/slower living, less commuting, less consumerism, etc
    i. This would leave much more time for constructive leisure time activities like socializing with family/friends/neighbors, learning/reading/research, creating art, landscaping/gardening, and other pleasurable activities/ hobbies
    b. The ‘ecovillage’ or ‘ecocity’ option
    i. Living much more locally – relearning many useful/practical skills which have been lost (ending the so-called ‘division of labor’) – getting closer to food production, building construction and maintenance, making clothing; more efficient local transportation networks; the ‘Blue Zones,’ etc.
    ii. Using the landscape more intelligently and sustainably; ‘ecodensity’ and New Urbanism; shared greenspace, gardenspace/farmland, pastureland, fishing and hunting areas, etc.
    iii. Ending the insecurity of “economic nomadism” and forced economic rootlessness by encouraging people to work more in their immediate local area(s)
    c. Undoing the overconcentration of wealth/power/influence in certain areas
    III. Implementing Major Environmental Improvement/Conservation Programs
    a. Widespread water/soil/air improvement: locally, regionally, and nationally
    b. Training many more people/workers in ‘green-collar’ fields like sustainable/organic agriculture, soil science, sustainable forestry, water conservation/protection, landscape/ecosystem restoration, sustainable animal husbandry, etc.
    c. Retrofitting old buildings to be much more energy efficient and building new buildings to be very eco-friendly and energy efficient
    d. Major initiatives in energy conservation and waste reduction/recycling
    i. Temporary transportation solution = mass-production of very energy-efficient small ‘smart cars’ will immediately slash overall consumption of ‘dirty energy’ until new cleaner transportation technologies can be invented
    IV. Controlling Population Growth
    a. Making birth-control options much more easily available (entirely free of cost and/or very inexpensive) and educating people on the extreme importance of maintaining healthy/sustainable/stable population levels

    1. There’s no shortage of inexpensive and widely available birth control in the Western world. If anything, whites should be having more babies, not less.

      You can’t have an intelligent conversation about overpopulation without getting into demographics. That’s the mistake people on both sides of this debate usually make. There are 30 million people in Canada versus 1.3 billion in China and 1.2 billion in India — is Canada (or any Western country) really the problem, especially considering that most of Canada’s white population is aging and has attained negative birth rates?

      If it were up to me, I would make the birth control pill illegal, at least in white countries. Not only because it underpins the whole modern feminist movement, but also because it is extremely unhealthy for women to take.

      Interesting that of the three people credited with creating “the pill,” two of them are jews.

  6. WHITE SURVIVAL | Reply

    And hey, why do you still link to Odessa Syndicate on this site? That site moved; it’s now @ http://www.occidentaldissent.com/

    1. Igor Alexander | Reply

      Thanks. Will update it.

  7. I just have to wade in here… Igor a crass and DKs listener, who’d have thought? Did you have Conflicts ‘The Ungovernable Force’? Great album that should be played at every riot. 😉

    Help me save Canada from Zionist control:
    http://ziofascism.net/blog/?p=1669

    1. I have a Conflict album on cassette but I don’t know if it’s that one. All my cassettes are boxed up right now so I can’t be bothered to check. I never really got into Conflict for some reason.

      Of the British anarcho-punk bands, I used to listen to Crass, Disorder, Oi Polloi, the Subhumans, UKDK, and Rudimentary Peni. I especially liked the Crass Bullshit Detector compilations, which anyone could submit a tape to; there was some really neat stuff on those. I still respect some of the music and packaging on those records but as far as politics, we’re at 180 degrees.

    2. Well, I think everyone should (re)learn to love Crass! I listened to some of their songs on Youtube recently(people still love them so much there are several Youtube users making videos for them!), was amazed at how insightful they were and how relevant they still are.

      Their song “white punks on hope”, should be appreciated by White Nationalists as well.

      What a kick in the head it is to the ARA and other ‘anti-fascist’ fools and commies, that the anarchist band Crass was onto them and their “white liberal shit”!

      White Punks on Hope:

      You’re Already Dead(a kick to the head of apathy)

      One day the nationalist and the anarchist movements will be united. In fact it is already happening.

      1. Good find! That was a new one on me.

        I went to a punk festival recently, not because I’m in the habit of attending such events (I’m too old) but because there was a band playing there I like. I saw a guy wearing a “Nazi Punks Fuck Off” T-shirt and another with a badge on his jacket showing a stickman throwing a swastika in a garbage. The funny thing was, looking around that venue, I saw one black guy, 3 or 4 Asians, some mystery meat, and everyone else was white as could be; and I live in a city in which whites are fast becoming a minority.

        Seems like yet another example of how it’s those who preach “diversity” the loudest who are the last ones who want it coming to their neighborhood.

  8. 14_NSBM_Warrior_88 | Reply

    I must admit, while Heavy Metal has structure and sound, Punk has spirit; as such, while the former can stand on its own in terms of musical talent, it needs the latter the truly communicate with its audience.

    Continuing the tangent about Punk, the only minorities I ever see at Punk shows are Asians and the occasional Hispanic or two. I did, at one time, see one Blispanic and a dreadlocked Black dude at a Crust show, but that’s about it. Beyond that, Punk moshpits resemble Ivory soap.

    At one time, I was a member to the altporn megasite SuicideGirls (yes, I know; feel free to call me out on it). During my year there (I quit since I clearly didn’t fit in), one contradiction in their hipster left-bank ideology glared at me the entire time. Despite all the site owners’ pandering to the Vegan, squatting, ALF loving, “LGBT”*, feminist crowd, they never opened up a group about freeing Palestine. Certainly, they had a Zionist “Pro-Israel” group, but the administration showed no love for the Palestinians crushed by Zionist tanks. Fascism, Nationalism and Racism are all indescribably evil…unless Jews are doing it, of course.

  9. Am Mrs Cherry Johnson from Spain,i want to testify about the good work of Dr Frank.
    i was looking for the right man in life that almost cost me my entire life because i was getting older and older every day until recieved a call from a friend who told me to contact Dr Frank that my problems will be solved i never believed but i decided to give him a trial.
    i contacted him and he told me that in 48hours my husband will come and to my greatest surprise on exactly 48hours i met Johnson and today we are happily married as husband and wife.
    what so ever your problems are today just contact Dr Frank now and your problems are solved.
    BLACKSPIRITSTEMPE@GMAIL.COM
    TEL:+2348078366264

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: